The Bracks Junta will be the first overtly totalitarian regime on Australian Soil; It nearly is at is .

Neil Mitchell launched a scoop on 3 AW this morning. He had received a tape of a meeting between Police Commissar Nixon on the now defunct Armed Robbery Squad. The purpose of it, Nixon telling the members of the squad it has been struck off, the members to be seconded to any other element of Vic. Police. She commenced in her usual managerialese-socio-babble-in whiny voice mod e-gobble-de-gook until an officer told to stop babbling and get on with it.So, what did she tell them but this: having, in her babble, repeated in an interview, ” we are changing the model to make it safer for police and try new approaches.’ When told to stop babbling, she came out with the real reason, she or, rather, her Mastahs, the Bracks Junta, simply wished top close it down.

The excuse is the complaints against members of the squad had been lodged claiming they are thugs. Where did the complaints come from? That bit of rubbish called the O.P.I. the “office of Police Integrity.

OPI orificers visited a jail and  asked convicts whether they had complaints against the Armed Robbery Squad. Well, surprise, surprise, they did have complaints. The O.P.I. acted on those complaints, and the junta had its excuse to shut down what happened to be a very effective serious crime-fighting unit. The “O.P.I.”, a suitable politically correct, socialisto babble speak Orifice of the Junta, was set up in the wake of the furore over the old drug squad. The Armed Robbery squad, however , is squeaky clean.It’s members are tough, and accept what they are paid to do, engage in a dangerous job bringing dangerous criminals to book, They have done it, fearlessly. Their crime is, well, not being nice to hardened, violent criminals.

The Squad has been very effective in bringing armed robbers to book. In contrast, violent crime has been  in generalincreasing, and the numbers of dangerous criminals have been multiplying exponentially. The reason is simple; the Bracks Junta has been making the streets safe for dangerous crims.

his, perhaps, is the real reason for the disbanding of the Squad. You, see, the members did take bringing violent crims to book seriously and do so in a tough war, unlike the treatment of so many other dangerous, violent criminals who are, effectively, depicted by the Junta and compliant Judges, as more victims than the real victims of violent scumbags.Nixon, being a Bracks Junta appointee, has been ‘modeling’ a model of dealing with armed robbery and, police will now apply the new lego model.

The law abiding man in the streets of Victoria has had enough with the garbage of rehabilitation’ and don’t tread on the toes of savages approach of the increasingly totalitarian morons, who who stuff Spring St., bureaucracy or, rather, goon squads, and ‘judiciary’.

Well, it is no surprise crims rule in Vic., ok, when the lying, professional dole bludgers in Spring Street are busily overthrowing private property rights, imposing police sate ‘laws’ – inclusive of the property rights in oneself. So, basically, the notion that the one thing that might justify ‘govt.’, use of coercion,in service of common law courts, against violent crims, is shredded by the fact the Junta, at bottom, is nothing but a pack of violent criminals in their actions; they are no better than the scumbags terrorizing Victorians because they are lawless. The Blasphemy Bill makes that clear.

Where are we heading? Britain is a pretty good clue. British police are no longer in the business of bringing scumbags to book. No, they are too busy ‘enforcing’ E.U. ‘Charter of Hooman Rights’, E.U. ‘Law’ and the L.P. Govt’s. own police state law’ against  decent types, whose offences range from selling fruit and veges in imperial weights to defending their own life and limb.

Indeed, defending one’s own life and limb is now a crime; they call it ‘taking the law into your hands’. Hell, the Oz federal Govt. has made sure no Aussie can defend life, limb and property because of it’s ‘gun laws’. No, the crim is free to shoot you. Rape you, bash you, stab you but that’s ok because, as is made plain by the Bracks Junta, absolutists pretending to be judges, and the totalitarian bent bureaucrats, hiding behind psycho-babble, take great pains to ‘educate’ Victorians into, the crims have ‘hooman rights’, and crims are mostly victims of ‘social injustice ‘ and ‘great personal hurt.’ Well,, unless you are white Anglo-Celt-Saxon aspirational type.

Now, on the count of crime, things will deteriorate further in Victoria and for no less a reason than the Junta’s “Charter of Human Rights”. That Bill, once it is enacted, virtually confers on selected ‘unique cultural types’ ‘rights’ to commit violent crimes”. If any of those protected types kill, rape, bash, stab a whitey, it is just because anyone who is of Celtic-Anglo-Saxon descent thoroughly deserves it. Yes, that is the force of the B.O.R. Aborginies are singled out in  to enjoy this novel privilege unhampered altogether, in a country which is meant to be ruled by the otherwise impersonal and high civilisation tradition of the Rule of Common Law.

Then, that is what the politicians, too many on the bench and rather many bureaucrats have been aiming at, the complete overthrow of the Rule of Common Law. What the B.o.R. effects, once enacted, is automatic subjection of all Victorians into vassal slaves of the Junta. All rights are no longer grounded in property rights.

Any right is reduced to a boon granted by the Junta. Your property – yourself, your home, goods, chattels, and economic assets, are no longer yours, the Junta owns everything. The Bill establishes that.

Moreover, the buttress against tyranny is totally overthrown. No Judge, including Supreme Court Judges can decide case contrary tot he letter of the B.O.R. or, even more rubbery, it’s ‘intent’. Under the B.O.R. no one is permitted to appeal to the High Court of Australia. In any case, Bracks and Hulls have made sure, the Supreme Court cannot rise against totalitarian measures.

The last appointee has never practiced as a barrister. Her greatest familiarisation with common law is ‘femininst studies.’ The other other one is not much better as she reassured Victorians, ” I will bring a female persective to law’.

The notion of rights contained in the bill belongs to the totalitarian notions of ‘govt’ as advanced by such as Hobbes and Comtes, and is not rooted in the real source of rights, absolute property rights and they are essential to economic freedom. The liberty of the individual is thus grounded and, what is more, Common Law is generated out of that, property rights and economic freedom; they are the grounds of Liberty and Common Law, which is why C.L.is, or was, the buttress against tyranny. One of the many leftist ignoramuses on the Spencer Street Soviet, aka the Age, wrote on Law :

the job of Parliament is to ‘rectify the law’.

Garbage, sheer garbage, the function of law is to protect free men and women against tyrannous politicians and bureaucrats and, as required reign in tyrants by bringing them to book.Not that that is transparent given the sheer numbers of ‘lawyers’ and judges’ in Victoria who are committed to some variation on the theme, ‘my ideal form of absolutism’, and the ‘Civil Liberties’ brigade are no damned better.

Oh, ‘Civil libertarians’ whine, loudly, for pet leftist causes, but never against the real threat to liberty. Then, the Law schools have long been busily stamping out Common Law as an irritant and a disturbance to the vision of a wunnerful day when totalitarian scumbags will prevail unhindered, and that day is upon us in Victoria. We already have a taste of it, the most obvious instance being the Blasphemy Law.

A few citations and quotes are in order:

In his second reading speech, head KGB goon, Attorney General Hulls boasts it is nothing like the U.S. Bill of Rights. Well, he is correct but not for the right reasons. The aim of the U.S. Bill, was to uphold the freedom of individuals against ‘govt.’ and tyranny’. Activist judges, much encouraged by treacherous ‘Democratic’ administrations have eroded the aim but it was the aim.

He also remarked, courts will not have ‘the power to strike down legislation’. It is highly understandable why that is a central term of the Junta’s Bill Of Rights.

He claims the Bill will be ‘educative’, the favorite cliché of an excuse of leftists for overthrowing real freedoms and property rights. The function, in common law, is not ‘educative’; it is the preservation of Liberty.

For those who wish to read the rest of Hulls’  rot,  turn to this page.

Bracks and Hulls are Liars, and here is an example, stated by a Liberal M.P., McIintosh, in the Lower House:

As I was made aware today, many judges see themselves as big winners in this circumstance. Out of professional courtesy I will not name the judge, because I knew him well at the bar, but a particular judge in anticipation of this charter of rights is already advocating that people should be preparing their submissions to courts where they are appearing before him with a view to raising issues of human rights.

Indeed with a case as simple as the Ansett insolvency case, which I thought was simple although it involved convoluted and complex technical aspects of insolvency and corporate law, now according to this particular judge involves issues of human rights. The sweep of human rights according to this judge will be all encompassing.

Ladies and gentleman, that is a Judge who is cheerily preparing for the day when common law is finished. Notice what the statement contains, the implicit fact property rights, the ground of liberty, is thrown down for ‘hooman rights’. Those who might remark, yes but the example the M.P. gives applies to companies and so it won’t hurt the ‘little man’ need to get a grip on law, for those who believe so are wrong. In fact, they are already wrong, for many ‘laws’ politicians and bureaucrats claim to be aimed at only stopping this or that ‘crime’ in fact hit the most modest of actions and interests. The B.o.R is worse, because it is exhaustive and absolute in what is dictated to the new vassal slaves called Victorians.

Above, I remarked, certain favored types will be free to virtually commit serious crimes Scot-free. Juveniles certainly do so today in Victoria. I find these remarks interesting because they cover all criminals:

I note that we have a matter of public importance on this issue — specifically in relation to sentencing — brought on by TheNationals for tomorrow. Under this charter decisions that are made in Canada are relevant…

There is a famous case in Canada — Askov’s case. The result of that case was that delays in excess of six to eight months between committal and trial were found to be unacceptable. As a result, people charged with conspiracy to commit extortion were given a permanent stay of proceedings because of a delay in excess of six

to eight months — in that case it was some 23 months.

As a direct consequence of that ruling, in the space of little over two years in Ontario alone some 43,000 charges were either dismissed, stayed or held over, never to reappear in the courts. The chronic delays in the Canadian courts were of such significance that they allowed a permanent stay of serious extortion charges. The charges dropped as a result were not just

driving charges but also manslaughter charges, several serious assault charges, several serious sexual assault charges, and charges of assault of police with a weapon…dismissed as a direct consequence of this ruling.

You will not get a trial date within 12 months if you are pleading not guilty to a serious charge in the State of Victoria….a recent statement by the secretary of the Criminal Bar Association of Victoria verifies that position. I have taken the opportunity to talk to a number of lawyers, who all agree…( and) problem is that it seems to be getting worse. Even

the government’s own papers demonstrate that delays in our courts are getting profoundly longer. Last financial year 88 per…

No further comment is required. On property rights:

…that flows from that is what happens to our property rights. Whatever else the international covenant has in it, we have gone down this channel historically before…

We debated a bill here that deprived people effectively of their property rights in the St Kilda triangle. The government said, ‘No, we didn’t’. It is still there, notwithstanding its being completely surrounded and notwithstanding that there was a case before the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal where the vindication of that particular leasehold was sought by the government.

In fact, as I have detailed in the case of X, the Junta through its goons squads, VCAT and, State Trustees (turned into a goon squad) has stolen private property, stripped financial assets of X, closed X’s accounts down and, are forcing her to prove herself not insane. This is before the Bill of Rights is enacted.

McIntosh gives more examples. What the B.OR does, in case anyone has not read it yet, makes it ‘legal’ for the Junta to take any of your property without even bothering to make any of its regular lies as excuses, and defend its confiscations in court an Parliament.

That is correct, the Junta can knock on your doorstep and take your property. In fact, it has put up Acts and articles of Acts, which already serve as pretexts for stealing your property and to resist invasion of your property by one of its goons is a criminal offence entailing prison sentences. One sch article is aimed at parents who would prefer yo school their children at home than in Victorian brainwashing camp euphemistically called a school. The next quote is amusing:

under clause 8 of the draft that was issued by the government, there was reference to the right to life. It

resided in subclause (1) of that draft, which reads: Every person has the right to life and has the right not to be arbitrarily deprived of life.

Subclause (2) reads: For the purposes of this Charter, subsection (1) applies to a person from the time of his or her birth. But the government found that it got into deep water about what is to be constituted by the definition of life. It found that it hit all sorts of hurdles amongst people in the community, so it took out that subclause. It took out any suggestion in this legislation about the notion of this impacting upon the right to life.The government even put a savings provision into this legislation, which appears in clause 48:Nothing in this Charter affects any law applicable to abortion or child destruction, whether before or after thecommencement of Part 2.

The right of anyone born in Victoria isn’t a right bestowed upon them by a pack of lying, snivelling socialistos. It is grounded in him-/herself, and upheld in common law but, as I commenced,  common law is overthrown by the Junta, courts and ‘department of corrections’ daily, and completely in the BOR. In Britain, as pointed out above, one’s rights are eliminated, since it is now even a criminal offence to defend oneself. And notice that Hitlerian/ Stalinist/Islamo-Nazi turn of phrase, ‘Child-destruction’.

That phrase is chilling. One can very well imagine a barrister entering the defence, a murder is not in fact a murder because he/she merely “destroyed a child.”.Clause 12, of Pt.2 of the Bill is a real gas:

Every person lawfully within Victoria has the right to move freely within Victoria and to enter and leave it and has the freedom to choose where to live.

That is your freedom under Common Law. Now, it is conditional upon the whim of the Junta. Just examine the three conditioning phrases of Clause 12. The grammatical force is unambiguous, the freedom of movement and residence anywhere in Victoria is actually struck down because it is allowed only at the whim of the Junta. No-one, expect for the members of the Junta, are in fact free to do so, since the property rights underpinning freedom of dwelling, movement, entry and exit are non-existent once the Bill is enacted and in force, those three conditioning terms makes that plain.

The above is the beginning of what will be an exhaustive scrutiny of the Bill and what the rotten commie scumbags responsible for it are actually about. I will take pains in covering it because the whole rotten totalitarian measure warrants a fulsome evisceration.The ALP is not submitting its BORs to referendum.

It has already altered the Constitution, several times. Unlike the Federal Constitution, it can do it by simple administrative bills Parliament. The Junta won’t submit BOR  to referendum, for a not so simple reason. why not is simple. Voters will  take the whole bloody lot of them and flog them to an inch of their lives because of it and ram there BOR up their unmentionables.

Instead, they are pushing this Bill through parliament and, hey presto, in one instant, and then a stroke of the G.-G’s. pen, and it’s a full-blown totalitarian regime Junta installed. Damn their miserable, useless, fat hides. The good for nothing, professional dole-bludging, totalitarian scumbags should be thrown into prison for treason – yes, literally, because that is what it amounts to. So they should be, and before it is too late.

Advertisements

2 Responses to “The Bracks Junta will be the first overtly totalitarian regime on Australian Soil; It nearly is at is .”

  1. Sen-Segt Paul Mullet is partly wrong,because the Bracks Cabinet is to blame and not just their glove puppet,Christine Nixon, the Junta’s Commisssar of Police. « Mangled Thoughts Says:

    […] Christine Nixon – she made the first defamatory remarks against the Squad in that secretly recorded meeting, the purpose of which was to say, you are sacked and the squad finished. [ Ref., here.] […]

  2. Sen-Segt Paul Mullet is partly wrong,because the Bracks Cabinet is to blame and not just their glove puppet,Christine Nixon, the Junta’s Commisssar of Police. « mangledthoughts Says:

    […] Christine Nixon – she made the first defamatory remarks against the Squad in that secretly recorded meeting, the purpose of which was to say, you are sacked and the squad finished. [ Ref., here.] […]

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: