Archive for October, 2006

Helen Kroger’s nomination for a safe seat a mere formality.

October 5, 2006

I repost the above article, written on the day a selection committee for a safe Liberal Senate seat affixed Michael Kroger’s rubber stamp ( the Committee)  to Helen’s nomination form. In it, I wrote of the implications for the Federal Liberal Party. What I wrote in that article, 21/6/06, is accurate and confirmed by the further decline of the Victorian Party, and what Kroger is now doing to the Victorian Liberal Party, described in,

Michael Kroger has commenced his purge of the Victorian Liberal Party.

So, Helen Kroger’s nomination for a safe seat a mere formality




Michael Kroger has commenced his purge of the Victorian Liberal Party.

October 4, 2006

My mole in 104 Exhibition Street has informed me: Kroger has ordered a Branch to be shut down. Kroger has a list of branches he will proceed to shut down. Kroger has also stopped formation of any new branches. The reason: to eliminate any Liberal Party member who is -opposed to him, suspected of opposing him. To eliminate Branches not loyal to him, are independent (of him); to ensure no such new Branch is formed.

Kroger has already ordered his stick puppet, $4000 a week Sheezel, to shut down the Kingston heath Branch. Kroger is using as his excuse; it doesn’t have enough members to be effective, and render its meetings official. The Branch has 15 members! It is also very active, unlike Dandenong Branch.

Dandenong has held one meeting, over 12 months ago. Its membership barely scrapes above 1.The President, a Mrs. Cunningham, employed by an MP, doesn’t lift a finger to make the Branch work. It won’t be closed because, it is dead. Unless, a spark of activity is seen, then Kroger would act against it, out of fear.

Kroger is beginning with Kingston Heath first, for the real reason: Its Chairman, Mr. Tim Warner, is a very active Liberal Party member, serving in 15 offices. Warner is, in Kroger’s eyes, a criminal. Warner, you see, opposes Kroger.Shutting down the Branch disqualifies Warner from continuing to serve the Party in those positions. Kroger, kills two foes with one stone, an active, independent Branch, and a staunch Liberal Party member, who opposes Kroger.

Kroger has ordered Julian ‘the Weasel’ Sheezel to do the dirty work. Well, that’s a mystery cleared up – why Kroger wrote a $4,000 week pay packet for ‘The Weasel’, because Jules sure doesn’t earn a cent of what he’s paid. He doesn’t produce a thing. What would he earn in enterprise? A junior clerk’s rates? He’s not capable of producing anything above $4,000 to warrant $4k a week.

Now we know why Kroger signed over $4,000 a week to “The Weasel”. Already Kroger’s hired thug, Kroger has nastier hit jobs for him. Oh, let’s not omit Kroger’s other thugs; Hannan, whose only career success to date is sucking up to Kroger, with the help of his big brother, and Potty “Mouth” Barry. Liberal Party members hand over funds and fees so Kroger can put his personal thuggish puppets into executive jobs and on pay many in enterprise, who are superior to that lot, will not see.

Michael Kroger is using the Victorian Liberal Party offices, 104 Exhibition St, as an extension to his in his Toorak mansion, and to eliminate –

Any Party member who opposes him; any Branch which opposes him; and any Branch independent of him.

Kroger, having stripped Richmond Branch of its voting rights, to impose Maina Walkley, is now making his major move: eliminating members, and stripping members of their Branches altogether, many Branches. Kingston is only the first on Kroger’s initial hit list.

Now, one did give the Federal Liberal Party a warning, in the article, Helen Kroger’s nomination for a safe seat a mere formality.

They should attend to the passage on what Helen Kroger said to Michael Kroger’s rubber stamp ‘selection committee’. There are senior Liberal figures, women as well as men, who have met Helen Kroger, and they have each said, independently:

She is a moron, she is a nasty bit of work, and she will be a disaster in the Senate, and a major embarrassment to the Party. She must be sacked as Senate Candidate for a safe Liberal Seat.

The Federal Party can find a reason to demand this. Under Party rules, she has demonstrated herself to be unfit. Yet, reason or no reason, when presented with a candidate like Helen, Federal ALP has intervened and thrown out such candidates. The Liberal Party must do the same; it has no choice, for Helen will, not might, not can; Helen will damage the Federal Liberal Party. My sources know the woman, and they are certain of it, for they have seen her in action firsthand.

Perhaps Helen only parroted Kroger when she told the selection committee, there must be a purge of the Party. One commented back then what a purge would be about. Right on the money, Michael has launched his Purge and, to use Helen’s euphemism, ‘rectification of the Party’.

Michael Kroger is eliminating Liberals, and Liberal Branches. Talent is stopped – the escalator has been switched off. In Prodos’ case, he got further than many other Liberals did, so Kroger had to knife him in public. There are blacklists of Liberals, identified as either opposed to/ as trouble for/as potential trouble/as merely being brighter, – to Kroger, his stick puppets and that lot of MPs in Spring St. Kroger is stopping formation of new Branches.

What counts is only Kroger and his Toorak Brahmin backers. They hold members in contempt, as so much dirt under the shoes, and only to be trampled on.

Now, what should all this tell the Federal Liberal Party? This:

Kroger is strangling the Party; he is killing it off. The Prime Minister wishes the Party to engage the general public, inclusive of at the local level. Kroger has made sure that that cannot occur long ago. It no longer engages Party members, and now it cannot at all engage them. Worse; there won’t be a Victorian Liberal Party to engage any Victorian. Oh, there will be Kroger, Costello, Helen Kroger, Toorak Political Brahmins, Kroger’s stick puppets, and that’s all. Wow.

What Kroger has now set himself to do is more than accelerating what is of deep concern to the Federal Party, the decline in members. He has effectively set himself to finish them off altogether.

Moreover, it is very likely that the Liberals will not survive the State election as a registered Parliamentary Party.

The Federal Party is facing the reality; the Victorian wing will be completely smashed, unless the Federal Party intervenes now. The Federal Party, therefore, also faces being wiped out in Victoria.

Or, is the Prime Minister relying on Michael Kroger, Peter Costello and Helen Kroger to do the work the Victorian Party doesn’t even cope with anymore?

Oh, who & how many will there be to even merely man polling booths – Kroger’s chums (- ‘that’s what the serfs are for’, but those not eliminated by Kroger are fleeing their Overlords)?

Kroger has to be sacked. Kroger’s stick puppets in 104 Exhibition Street have to be fired. Helen Kroger has to be sacked as the Senate Candidate in a safe Liberal seat. That’s only for starters.

It’s the Maina & Michael Kroger Show Extravaganza – to Win the Seat of Richmond.

October 4, 2006

With Kroger’s full support and approval, Maina Walkley, announced she will hold her campaign launch in Maidstone Village. That’s right, Maidstone Village, and not in Richmond.

My Mole in 104 Exhibition told all. I assumed it was a joke. My mole cut the belly laugh,”It’s not funny! It’s true.” “It’s true?” “Yes. Kroger approved it” We both broke up laughing.

Maina decided she would hold her extravaganza in Maidstone Village. She put in her request and Kroger approved it.

Well, Kroger does control the Party. He gives the orders, he hires and fires Party employees. He wrote Sheezel a $4,000 a week pay packet. He does much else, so, we can tell, there’s nothing irregular in Kroger directing the election campaign.

For those not familiar with Victoria, Maidstone is northwest of Melbourne, crammed in between Flemington racetrack, home of the Melbourne Cup, on its right , Footscray up its bottom, and Sunshine on its left. Richmond is decidedly south, in up against the City ,miles S-E-S from Maidstone village. The voters of Richmond are noticed in Maidstone for their absence.

The Mayor was grumbling only the other day, I’m sure, Richmondites.are a fickle lot , they won’t pay me tithe (rates). Maidstone Branch members are furious, no doubt, at the no-show of the Richmondites in Maidstone booths last State election.

The merits are obvious. Maina’s sole voting base and her own Kroger Party Branch, resides there, Filipinos. They’re loyal to Maina, she’s loyal to them, they’re all loyal to each other. Why, they’re even loyal to the Philippine Govt. A good thing too because, there’s safety in numbers and being far away — Liberal vassal serfs in Richmond are in pretty mutiny.

Maina’s big night out, her Ring-a-Ding-a-Ling Circus, is an all clown show -featuring her dancing troupe of Filipino flappers. Kroger must be there too, for he ordered it, and only stabbed Prodos and Richmond members in order to inflict Maina upon the serfs.

Maina shares many of his qualities. She hasn’t a Liberal Principle in her bod; doesn’t give a stuff about the Party, Victorians, and Australians. She’s out for herself. She’s conceited and dense – it’s yet to penetrate, Richmond detests her. She’s highly qualified too – as an enthusiastic supporter of Kroger.

Kroger has only one other pal in the world, his twin, Peter Costello. So, it must be a comfort to him to have Maina right up behind him.

No, really, the man is not liked at all in Victoria. There are shoe repairers who will tell you: ” Kroger, that man. Oh I remember him.” In rural Victoria, Liberal members are honest on Kroger, so long as they’re sure you aren’t a Kroger stooge – reprisals breeds reticence.

Maina and Kroger should be consistent, and run the rest of their campaign in Maidstone. Yet, they’ve done enough with this stunt.

What did the Maidstone Branch and their Candidate do to Kroger to deserve such punishment? What will the voters in Maidstone make of Maina running for Richmond in their seat, and while the Maidstone Liberal Candidate is yet to open his campaign? Answer: The Liberals have gone completely bonkers and round the bend.

What will be the great impact of the Ring a Ding a Ling Circus night ? Richmond is gone so, what the heck, why not go the whole hog and wipe out Maidstone too? For Kroger has only, by this stunt, wiped out more Liberal votes. Brilliant just, spiffing brilliant. Kroger, the Political Meister Clutzenhead.

What about Maidstone Branch members and Candidate? What, what are they supposed to make of it? Turn up and give Maina and Kroger their wholehearted support, cheer, applaud, and pound the streets for her, crying:

“Roll up, roll up and see the amazing Kroger and his dancing stick puppet. See the greatest clown show in town!”

All they can do is weep in their homes, as Kroger, Maina and her flapping Filipinos trample the electorate into mud in a single night.

The only good thing about the launch is: it won’t inflict more damage in Richmond. Kroger has made it an impregnable ALP seat, so they can’t inflict more damage. Neither can, stuck out in Maidstone, Kroger and Maina disturb Richmondites with their riot – Maidstonites will be frothing but they’re far away.

Besides, next to many other matters, Richmondites won’t like one jot Maina’s and Kroger’s grand plan to make Richmond for ever an outpost of the Philippine Govt.

Kroger has once again, by this stunt, shown how dense he is. So, just to cheer up Kroger: it won’t be long before a sobriquet is doing the rounds in Maidstone, and Richmond:

‘Maina the Maidstone Village Idiot Stick Puppet. ‘

The Monty Python crew combined effort to brains to come up with good scripts. Kroger just comes up with his stuff – and the man is denser than a concrete slab, and possessed of all the humour and wit of a hired thug.

Fringed “Snuff Puppets”

October 4, 2006

Slatts has it in one, the “The Melbourne Fringe Comedy Festival” is so funny, punters have to be dragged out of their homes by the Yartz police, then manacled and chained to seats, to attend. Why it’s so side-splitting that they save the serfs the OH&S dangerous job of laughing by playing, loudly, ‘canned laughter’.

Such a heady display of comic genius requires, of course, oodles of money extracted very painfully from real taxpayers. Without the pigs’ trough, why, artistes cannot ‘create’; artistes can’t stage something worse than heel-kickers very own, rainy day, puppet show in the family home living room. The serfs insides aren’t hurting for nothing.

There is where the “Snuff Puppets” come in. The Herald Sun has an article on this lot of  deeply, profoundly sensitive cretins –


Jihadi,  Snuff Puppet, and ‘director’ Andy Freer , posing for the camera crying; “Stuff you Mr. president, Stuff the West, Stuff the Victims.”

Freer was on the phone to Neil Mitchell, radio 3AW, to explain his great artistic morsel. Well, sort of explain. He’s barely literate. Those quotes in the Herald Sun are too coherent, it turns, out for his command of English. A good guess is, the journalists deciphered his mumblings, and made him seem slightly more intelligent than a lobotomised snail.

It took him some time to answer Mitchell’s question, ” What it is about”. Mitchell had to ask it several times, each time trying to formulate it so the cretin could grasp it – “just summarise it”.Well, eventually, Freer got there, and to paraphrase what he said, we begin by quoting from the H.S:

“We’ve made a 10-minute piece basically recreating the incident.”

He explained to Mitchell:

” We go inside the Twin Towers and find Arab Muslims, who reveal themselves and their beliefs and then it is realised they are one with us. Everyone reconciles their different beliefs, and harmony is restored.”

It’s clear where he plagiarised those lines, Steve Bracks’ Blasphemy Act and his Bill of (anti-)Rights. From his moral dark high tower, he is only helping to compelete the dis-Enlightenment our stupid politicians are so brilliantly imposing- he said so in the Herald Sun –

“Mr Freer said the purpose of The Twin Towers Show was to spark debate and understanding of the atrocity.”

And, to Mitchell.

Wait a minute! The old spaghetti might be slow to slop around these days but, it’s kicked in: the treacherous left have been muttering that rubbish from the day of the atrocity. Then,there is also that smelly little line echoing loud and clear in his grand pronouncements – ‘ westerners must understand’ the monsters out to exterminate the Jews, destroy Israel, and do pretty well much the same to the West.

Indeed, William Dalrymple, not to be confused with the good Doctor of Spectator fame, but now  writes for the Spectator ( am I mistaken in noting the Speccie has veered leftward this last year? Bron Waugh must be rolling in his grave) is the latest useful idiot to suck up to Islamo-Nazis.For his efforts,  Melanie Phillips gives him a good kick up the goolies.

Whoa, hold the horses! What about that bit about it the atrocity is all the West’s,  Bush’s,  Howard’s, and Tony Blair’s fault? Could Freer have omitted that article of the treacherous’s little right belief on Islamo-Nazis Credo? This, in the Herald Sun, must be a subtle, gentle, of trying to correct mere hard faced, cold hearted Melbournians:

“US President George W. Bush is represented by a shrub wearing a Texan hat. “It can be shocking, it’s very black humour,” Mr Freer said.”

Whew, that’s a relief. Someone might have accused him of denying a major article of the treacherous left’s little credo and what would that mean for his Yartz funding, and his street cred?

Mind, leftie pillow biter Mitchell is ambidextrous. While, as he proudly proclaimed during the Israeli operations in Lebanon, he condemned Hezlbollah murder of Israelis, rocket attacks and other horrors committed by that lot of vermin. He also condemned Israel defending itself by going into Lebanon to take them out. This is the excuse he gave, repeatedly, during the operations: ” Israel is better than that”.

Well, that clears one thing up; Israel really should do the decent thing the treacherous left and Koffi Anan demands, roll over and let the Islamo-Nazi scumbags slaughter them. Truly, Mitchell would feel at ease in the Kroger Parasite Party, they are cretinous clowns too.

Mitchell asked moral giant Freer, how much he’d received for this ‘artistic production’. Freer wouldn’t say. Mitchell, correctly, replied that it is taxpayers’ money and they are entitled to know how much.

A caller told Mitchell; he has known Freer and his troupe of Snuff Flick Puppeteers for 15 years, and that they have always been bludging off good ol’ taxpayer per Yartz grants. Ladies and gentlemen, Yartz grants are very profitable for the receivers of stolen goods, reflected in – they live very pleasant lives (having related one example of a ‘poor struggling artiste’, and one could furnish some more examples of these selfish, talentless, cretins).

Mitchell replied to the caller: “I’ve got no problem with that. They are entitled to it.”

Does that mean, Mitchell, the caller is entitled to help himself to your own private property too, so long as he styles himself an artiste? Do you have a clue, Mitchell, as to what you said in that singular word, “entitled”? Oh, indeed, Mitchell would be as welcome in the Kroger Parasite Party as in the Bracks lead Parasite Party,  and they are all as funny as each other.

Being an artiste, Freer should be funded to gain the experience and observations and perspective an artiste needs in order to ‘create’. Give him a one way ticket to Iran or Al Qaeda land.  Good luck, Freer, happy creating, and don’t forget to sow lots of  peace and harmony – don’t omit quoting at them your profound message. Can we then, Freer, expect lots of peace and harmony from the vermin in a matter of hours after your arrival – oh, alright, we’ll be generous and wait a year for the great blessing of your artistic journey to fruit into a thousand poppies ? 

A cynic might warn Freer, the vermin will rather sow the fields with his carcass – just to see if it sends up new shoots, but who am I to disabuse the chump? Happy Snuffed Puppet creating, Freer. 

Oh, dear, dear, dear; Freer has just telephoned the airline booking desk. He’s cancelled his flight; that’s very disappointing. Poor, vassal taxpayer had high expectations of Freer. Pity, another opportunity wasted. It seems the artistic experience isn’t all that spiffing after all. Turns out, he prefers living the high life, thanks to the fortunes Bracks and co hand over to cretins who style themselves artistes. Well, a chap can’t have it all, lots of ‘creative’ juice, and wealth – courtesy of Bracks snapping off the fingers and legs of real taxpayers. The serfs of Victoria will rejoice – Freer is sticking to their wallets like glue.

Is the Victorian Attorney General of Victoria, Mr. Hulls, a Thief? Conclusion.

October 3, 2006

Conclusion to: Is Rod Hulls a Thief

The Liberal Party is not unaware of what is going on.MLA, David Davis was briefed by X and Y on her case. He didn’t take notes, and he has been derelict in his duty as an MP in not pursuing it in Parliament. His defection is worse because of what the Govt. has done, and the principles involved. He has never responded, and has refused approaches made by others on their behalf.

It is interesting the Liberals have been mute on the activities of the Govt.- through its agent the Office of State Trustees, when accounting firms, financial firms, and lawyers around Melbourne know what is going on. Their complacency is all the more interesting, when it is also not only Davis who has been fully briefed on a case. It emerges the Liberal party has, in fact, had a very good clue as to what the Office is culpable for rather many years now.

During a second reading debate on a Bill in 1994, MP Mildenhall (Footscray) remarked on,

“In recent times State Trustees has had a dreadful record as trustees of last resort.

…State Trustees was failing in that responsibility and had been the subject of a number of serious complaints…

…complainants had nowhere to go. They had to rely on agencies such as the Villamanta legal service to take up the case. Two cases were referred to in the article of 2 August 1997.”

Mr. Dollis (Richmond) related:

“…an elderly woman who was being moved into a nursing home. Her daughter had been her full-time carer for many years. The mother had left the house to her daughter in her will.

Regardless… the State Trustees sold the house to increase the capital for investment. The daughter then had nowhere to live and the mother’s wishes were not taken into account…”

Mr. Dollis continued:

“In some cases institutions, carers and lawyers for the represented person are fighting the State Trustees, the Guardianship and Administration Board and the Office of the Public Advocate. The argument is about which side should have control of the client. Many people would, if given the choice, not have the State Trustees control every aspect of their lives because it can be difficult to break free from its control mechanisms.”

What the Office, with the aid of the other bodies, is doing on a large scale, it has been doing on a large scale for many years now. This squares with what I have been told: firms have had a very nasty time in trying to achieve the near impossible, protect their clients and their assets from the Govt and its Office. Now we know why: They are robbing ‘clients’ for all they can get hold of.

“Serious complaints, it is now clear, is an understatement of what the complaints are about. The favoured tactic is to put victims under ‘perpetual guardianship’. The other is, to repeat, is to siphon of funds and other assets placed with them, even as mere executors of wills. It involves the full gamut of the ‘business’ of the Office wills. The Office can even, if it believes it can succeed move against an executor to make itself the executor of an estate.

How can politicians defend all that? How can the Liberal refuse to do their duty and see justice done!

Why has the Liberal Party supinely accepted the criminal actions of the Office? Why have they not sought justice? Not called for police investigations into the Office and the Ministry, and a full parliamentary inquiry? Why was Davis so abysmally derelict in his duty to his constituent, X, another victim of such disgusting cruelty?

This is not the usual rotten bit of Govt. corruption. This is far worse, and too many Victorians are victims. What the Office is committing is on a large scale. Moreover, what they have done to some Victorians is truly disgusting, appalling, shocking, and cruel.

Just remember that poor lady, T1. And, readers, remember this:

They have shown they will do it to anyone whose affairs are placed with them, all of their interests or just some. It is quite clear; they are prepared to go to considerable lengths to take a victim’s property.

It is clear what the duty of the Liberals in fact is, even if Ted and the Kroger ‘Liberal Party’ don’t like facing up to their duty. It is clear what actions have to be taken against the Office.

In the meant-time, anyone who is contemplating placing any of their business with the Govt. through its Trustees Office, anyone contemplating making a will with the Office, contemplating anything that might be ordinarily put through the Office, the advice is, Don’t.

Be warned, you will be dealing with criminals who will, at best siphon off only 1/3 of your property. At worst, they will seize all of it and ruin you completely. Time for a police investigation, a full Parliamentary Inquiry, and the Federal Attorney General to act; they have no choice in this, because now it is their duty.

Is Rod Hulls A Thief?

October 2, 2006

Indeed, is he the only Bracks Cabinet Minister who is a thief? The Victorian Government State Trustees Office comes under the ministerial responsibility of several Cabinet ministers. Right now, ‘Trustees’ seems a euphemism for something entirely different.During the last few days, I was handed shocking information This is a two part item on what the Bracks Govt. is doing daily to many Victorians, by its Office, the Victorian Office of State Trustees, and on a massive scale.

One has continued to remind readers of the case of X and Y, and still running.In summary:

The Office has sought to have courts declare X insane and made a “ward of the state”. The reason, to seize X’s assets and strip them. As I related, they have effectively done that in regards to X’s superannuation and bank accounts.

Readers might recall, they shut down X’s accounts and transferred her funds into the Office’s central accounts. They have refused to obey court orders requiring a return of only a fraction of the property and, at that, income stream from X’s superannuation.

The Office declared, ” We don’t have to”. They are confident in their authority to defy courts. That they are, points directly to the Ministry, for that is the basis of their authority. The Ministry has direct responsibility and oversight for their actions and, crucially, in its compliance with the Law and its duty as ‘trustees’ -this is Hull’s immediate job.

The Office has stripped 1/3 of the value of the units in X’s super account. Yes, that is right, they’ve literally stolen 1/3 of her super fund. Where are the missing funds is anybody’s guess, except for: they are in some Govt. account and that means spent. This is not all.

The Office is busy attempting to seize X’s fixed assets. A court order has been issued against the Office to stop the Office.

The office has deliberately told lies against X and her spouse. The lies they have told before a court include: X and Y are not married and don’t live together. Documentary evidence had to be supplied to incontrovertibly prove the Office had lied to the court – perjury. Why did they lie? It is central to their tactics in seeking to have X declared insane.

As I stated, X is not insane. X does have multiple sclerosis, which has impaired X’s eyes to a degree, and that is all.

X has been forced to ‘prove’ that she is not insane, itself a mockery of due process, rules of evidence and much else besides.

To be clear: The objective of the Office all along has been to seize X’s property, and transfer it into the Govt.’s accounts.

It has done so already, the 1/3 of the Super fund it has siphoned off. It has taken other balances.

Readers, the case of X, right through from the beginning, is shocking enough. Yet, it pales before what has been divulged to me.

What the Govt. runs is not done against a few Victorians: It is done on a large scale, by its Office of State Trustees. It is well known by accounting firms and financial firms all around Melbourne. I begin with another case, related by my sources, and it is know by firms around Melbourne.

T1 is or was (past tense for reasons to be made very clear) an heir to family property. After a shocking accident, in which the family was killed, T1 was the family’s sole heir – and was , due to the horrific accident, a wealthy woman.

T1 was of modest means, lived in the outer suburbs. By prudence, she had paid off her own house.

T1 inherited a country property, with valuable livestock, equipment, and of course, all goods and valuables that came with house and property.

T1 has, or had, very close and decent friends who have stood by X in her grief. T1 was, as readers can imagine, more than distraught. T1, understandably, had a nervous breakdown.

The Office of State Trustees found out about T1, her inheritance, and her nervous breakdown.

The Office moved swiftly against T1, and succeeded in having T1 declared ‘schizophrenic’ and a ‘Ward of the State’. They then took over all T1’s property.

The office made a paper only sale of the two properties and for the paper only grand total of $40,000

$40,000 for one urban house; 1 country farm with homestead; plus very valuable livestock and equipment; all goods, chattels, and valuables in both houses. All that was T1’s and her family, seized and sold right out from under her.

Who purchased the properties in the ‘sale’ .is rhetorical only. The Govt. that’s who.

They then sold the properties, livestock and all goods, into markets for their full values. The Govt. has pocketed millions of dollars worth of proceeds from this act of naked robbery against T1, as is par for the course in other cases

They made T1, is/was totally destitute, and reduced her to the lot of a tramp.

Coming so soon after the disaster, T1, as readers can appreciate, totally broke down. Understandably, T1 no longer bothered even bathing. Then, so soon after these monstrous actions against T1, T1 disappeared.

T1’s friends are, understandably, distressed, having never seen T1 again or even heard of T1 again. What the Govt. did to T1 lead to her disappearance.

Realistically, T1 might be dead and if that is the case, the Govt’s. actions– lead to her death.

They committed robbery, and they did it using the courts, having succeeded in having T1 declared a ‘schizophrenic’ and on that, made a ” Ward of the State” and from that, the Office made T1’s “trustees”. The rest was simple.

It is easy to fathom how they could have laundered the property and the proceeds back into the Govt. revenues, so let’s not waste time on this, it is the fact of what they did to her that matters.

They did it all in a very short period of time.

What types are they to so readily rob anyone of even 1/3 of their property?

What sort of people are they to do it to someone who is overcome with grief, and kick her out into the gutters, to have possibly to have died from all the grief and trauma she was made to endure by the Govt.

Many Victorians have found out to their distress, suffering, and great losses what a pack of thugs that lot are. This is not a story, readers, these are facts; it is what the Govt., through its agents, the Office and VCAT did to T1, and what they have done to many Victorians, and continue to do.

That’s right: there are victims who once owned their own homes and now don’t. There is a large number of Victorians who have had their accounts stripped by the Office. Some are now completely destitute, and, as in the case of T1, worse off. Those the office manages to have declared ‘mental health patients’ and ‘wards’ have suffered the very worst the Office can deal out to its ‘clients’.

On top of all this, it charges its victims a 5-6% per annum admin fee before they are finished with their victims. Or, until victims finally succeed to get the Govt. kicked out of their private property and have their full inalienable rights restored.

The Office offers ‘financial services’ through its ‘retail shops’ -touting for the business of any potential ‘customer’ who is ignorant of what the Office is doing, and face it, many are, as I have been until the day I was informed of the case of X and, now, these latest revelations.

It is well known by many firms what the Office is doing to very many Victorians who decide to use its services. Once the Office gets its claws into anyone’s properties, that is it, they start siphoning of amounts. Firms have tried to fight back but it is very difficult and for several reasons:

The Office has behind it the full authority of the Ministry. Secondly, fighting the Office and seeking to reclaim all property, including compensation for the amount of property stolen is, at best, difficult, and exorbitant to pay for and the reason why is simple:

The Office, for instance, can secure a Supreme Court order against any of its victims it calls its ” clients’ and “customers’’, who decide to fight back, in a matter of hours. It costs a victim $700 to lodge one appeal and takes longer for a ‘client’ than a mere few hours. To proceed to court action, requires, even in VCAT, a QC – that is correct, a QC, and that means a cost of a minimum of $2,000 per sitting day. Keep in view, the Office fields a side of lawyers.

For the Office, the expense of legals is pin money. Why? Just consider that 1/3 of a victim’s funds; and any more it siphons out of the victim’s other accounts it has seized, renders $700 for a Supreme Court order against a Victim, a trifle. Keep in view, a Supreme Court Judge is completely ignorant of the case itself, and what is going on. The Judge is relying on the fact of , the statutory standing and reputation of the office, and that of Hulls’ Office.

The Office’s are barely a cent against the day it succeeds in seizure of all a victim’s property. It will realise proceeds on properties worth anywhere from hundreds of thousands of dollars to, as in the case of T1, some millions of dollars. We can see, just from the case of T1 Office is engaged in large scale fraud and robbery.

The Office runs on the principle; victims will give up because they will be financially exhausted. It works. Worse as a victim’s trustee, as in the case of X, they starve their victim of income so the victim cannot maintain even their daily living expenses let alone afford to fight. (X is lucky, with her spouse, she has been able to run the case but even then, it has been a great burden on them to fight the case.)

The Office proceeds to ensure a case is dragged out, with the cooperation of VCAT. They will wait for as long as it takes to bankrupt the victim, to starve the victim out. If it takes 3, or 5 years, or more, they will see it out – the ‘rewards’ make it worthwhile. Moreover, during all that time the Office uses the victim’s funds, and is siphoning off, in X’s case, 1/3 of her just her super fund.

That’s right, it uses funds held in trust, to not increase the capital of its victims, but to make profits for the government. They run down their ‘clients’ and ‘customers’ accounts to enrich the Govt. and its employees. By ‘run down’, what it is of course, is literal robbery, and committed on a massive scale.

Here’s the rub; the evidence for the activities of the Govt. is widespread. Firms, lawyers, advisers, and victims, their seconds and close friends, can furnish the evidence they have, and I was given no doubt, the evidence is very damning, it is extensive, it is overwhelming so long as investigations conducted into the Govt. are run by unimpeachable criminal detectives and other officers of the Crown of impeccable reputation.

There is a hint; witnesses are reluctant to come forth right now because of the real fear of what the Govt, through its Office, can do to them in retaliation. A police investigation and a full Parliamentary Inquiry is required.

The Federal Attorney General might indeed have to act, in view of who is involved and what is involved.

P.S.:The Dept of Justice – under Attorney General; Rod Hulls; “Human Services”- Helen Garbutt; Finance and Treasury – the Treasurer John Brumby, to name a few ministers; and Thwaites; all have direct ministerial responsibilities for the Office of State Trustees.