Archive for the ‘Cretins’ Category

Fringed “Snuff Puppets”

October 4, 2006

Slatts has it in one, the “The Melbourne Fringe Comedy Festival” is so funny, punters have to be dragged out of their homes by the Yartz police, then manacled and chained to seats, to attend. Why it’s so side-splitting that they save the serfs the OH&S dangerous job of laughing by playing, loudly, ‘canned laughter’.

Such a heady display of comic genius requires, of course, oodles of money extracted very painfully from real taxpayers. Without the pigs’ trough, why, artistes cannot ‘create’; artistes can’t stage something worse than heel-kickers very own, rainy day, puppet show in the family home living room. The serfs insides aren’t hurting for nothing.

There is where the “Snuff Puppets” come in. The Herald Sun has an article on this lot of  deeply, profoundly sensitive cretins –


Jihadi,  Snuff Puppet, and ‘director’ Andy Freer , posing for the camera crying; “Stuff you Mr. president, Stuff the West, Stuff the Victims.”

Freer was on the phone to Neil Mitchell, radio 3AW, to explain his great artistic morsel. Well, sort of explain. He’s barely literate. Those quotes in the Herald Sun are too coherent, it turns, out for his command of English. A good guess is, the journalists deciphered his mumblings, and made him seem slightly more intelligent than a lobotomised snail.

It took him some time to answer Mitchell’s question, ” What it is about”. Mitchell had to ask it several times, each time trying to formulate it so the cretin could grasp it – “just summarise it”.Well, eventually, Freer got there, and to paraphrase what he said, we begin by quoting from the H.S:

“We’ve made a 10-minute piece basically recreating the incident.”

He explained to Mitchell:

” We go inside the Twin Towers and find Arab Muslims, who reveal themselves and their beliefs and then it is realised they are one with us. Everyone reconciles their different beliefs, and harmony is restored.”

It’s clear where he plagiarised those lines, Steve Bracks’ Blasphemy Act and his Bill of (anti-)Rights. From his moral dark high tower, he is only helping to compelete the dis-Enlightenment our stupid politicians are so brilliantly imposing- he said so in the Herald Sun –

“Mr Freer said the purpose of The Twin Towers Show was to spark debate and understanding of the atrocity.”

And, to Mitchell.

Wait a minute! The old spaghetti might be slow to slop around these days but, it’s kicked in: the treacherous left have been muttering that rubbish from the day of the atrocity. Then,there is also that smelly little line echoing loud and clear in his grand pronouncements – ‘ westerners must understand’ the monsters out to exterminate the Jews, destroy Israel, and do pretty well much the same to the West.

Indeed, William Dalrymple, not to be confused with the good Doctor of Spectator fame, but now  writes for the Spectator ( am I mistaken in noting the Speccie has veered leftward this last year? Bron Waugh must be rolling in his grave) is the latest useful idiot to suck up to Islamo-Nazis.For his efforts,  Melanie Phillips gives him a good kick up the goolies.

Whoa, hold the horses! What about that bit about it the atrocity is all the West’s,  Bush’s,  Howard’s, and Tony Blair’s fault? Could Freer have omitted that article of the treacherous’s little right belief on Islamo-Nazis Credo? This, in the Herald Sun, must be a subtle, gentle, of trying to correct mere hard faced, cold hearted Melbournians:

“US President George W. Bush is represented by a shrub wearing a Texan hat. “It can be shocking, it’s very black humour,” Mr Freer said.”

Whew, that’s a relief. Someone might have accused him of denying a major article of the treacherous left’s little credo and what would that mean for his Yartz funding, and his street cred?

Mind, leftie pillow biter Mitchell is ambidextrous. While, as he proudly proclaimed during the Israeli operations in Lebanon, he condemned Hezlbollah murder of Israelis, rocket attacks and other horrors committed by that lot of vermin. He also condemned Israel defending itself by going into Lebanon to take them out. This is the excuse he gave, repeatedly, during the operations: ” Israel is better than that”.

Well, that clears one thing up; Israel really should do the decent thing the treacherous left and Koffi Anan demands, roll over and let the Islamo-Nazi scumbags slaughter them. Truly, Mitchell would feel at ease in the Kroger Parasite Party, they are cretinous clowns too.

Mitchell asked moral giant Freer, how much he’d received for this ‘artistic production’. Freer wouldn’t say. Mitchell, correctly, replied that it is taxpayers’ money and they are entitled to know how much.

A caller told Mitchell; he has known Freer and his troupe of Snuff Flick Puppeteers for 15 years, and that they have always been bludging off good ol’ taxpayer per Yartz grants. Ladies and gentlemen, Yartz grants are very profitable for the receivers of stolen goods, reflected in – they live very pleasant lives (having related one example of a ‘poor struggling artiste’, and one could furnish some more examples of these selfish, talentless, cretins).

Mitchell replied to the caller: “I’ve got no problem with that. They are entitled to it.”

Does that mean, Mitchell, the caller is entitled to help himself to your own private property too, so long as he styles himself an artiste? Do you have a clue, Mitchell, as to what you said in that singular word, “entitled”? Oh, indeed, Mitchell would be as welcome in the Kroger Parasite Party as in the Bracks lead Parasite Party,  and they are all as funny as each other.

Being an artiste, Freer should be funded to gain the experience and observations and perspective an artiste needs in order to ‘create’. Give him a one way ticket to Iran or Al Qaeda land.  Good luck, Freer, happy creating, and don’t forget to sow lots of  peace and harmony – don’t omit quoting at them your profound message. Can we then, Freer, expect lots of peace and harmony from the vermin in a matter of hours after your arrival – oh, alright, we’ll be generous and wait a year for the great blessing of your artistic journey to fruit into a thousand poppies ? 

A cynic might warn Freer, the vermin will rather sow the fields with his carcass – just to see if it sends up new shoots, but who am I to disabuse the chump? Happy Snuffed Puppet creating, Freer. 

Oh, dear, dear, dear; Freer has just telephoned the airline booking desk. He’s cancelled his flight; that’s very disappointing. Poor, vassal taxpayer had high expectations of Freer. Pity, another opportunity wasted. It seems the artistic experience isn’t all that spiffing after all. Turns out, he prefers living the high life, thanks to the fortunes Bracks and co hand over to cretins who style themselves artistes. Well, a chap can’t have it all, lots of ‘creative’ juice, and wealth – courtesy of Bracks snapping off the fingers and legs of real taxpayers. The serfs of Victoria will rejoice – Freer is sticking to their wallets like glue.


If a driver ran a red light and killed a pedestrian,

August 29, 2006

It is most likely the driver would be arrested and charged with manslaughter, and convicted. A Bicyclist, however, is given a fine and told not to do it again.

DOZENS of speeding cyclists failed to help a dying man knocked down by a rider during a dangerous bayside race.Witnesses said up to 50 cyclists continued their 60km/h charge in the so-called Hell Ride after the elderly man was struck.

Cyclist Justin Heitman told the Herald Sun yesterday how he cradled 77-year-old James Gould as he lay on Beach Rd.

 Kooyong man Michael Ryssenbeek, whose wife, Helene, died when hit by a cyclist in Malvern in 2000, said penalties needed to match the magnitude of such a tragedy.

The man who struck his wife was fined $300 on a charge of failing to stop at a red light.

Lycra bum who hit Gould will be fined  $300, though, apparently, police are contemplating whether graver charges can be laid against the criminal.

The following statement by Assistant Commissioner (Traffic) Noel Ashby  does not ring true at all:

there was a possibility the cyclist could be charged with conduct endangering life. An investigation was continuing.

He said it was a complex area, as the law did not regard bicycles in the same way as motor vehicles.

“Because someone might drive through a red light it doesn’t necessarily mean that person is guilty of culpable driving. And the same thing applies to a cyclist,” he said.

A driver caught running a red light, even if accidental, is most unlikely to be let off . I can imagine a couple of exceptions of accidentally doing so but they are rare exceptions if they occur, and even so, it is most unlikely the driver would be let off.

As for hitting and injuring a pedestrian, the Act has been weighted against drivers, the driver is presumed guilty, despite the fact that large numbers of pedestrians walk against pedestrian lights, and jump in front of oncoming traffic. Pedestrians on St. Kilda Road, during the work-a-day week, are terrifying; the surprise is how very few of them, if any, have been hit as a consequence. None-the-less, even if it is the pedestrian’s fault, the driver faces a stiff time at the hands of the police and the court. One has no desire to hit a pedestrian and, no doubt it would be shocking to do so, this makes one rather irritated by the suicidal types.

I nearly did it  one evening  when a pedestrian stepped out in front of my car only feet ahead. I just managed to bring it to a stop – even though I was driving in that stretch slowly – I certainly was not driving faster than 40 kph. Apart from the fright, I also felt also at once relieved precisely because driver’s defence, under the Act, virtually does not exist.

If that pedestrian had stepped out a couple or a few more seconds later, I was sure of it then, I would have hit her and then, I would have faced a further ugly time of it in a police station.  

Whereas, bicyclists deliberately  riding dangerously, running red lights and killing pedestrian who had the crossing right of way, are let off with a $300 slap on the wrist. The following is rubbish:

Former Olympic cyclist and regular Hell Rider Robert Crowe blasted a reckless element of the group putting lives in danger.

He said cycling enthusiasts had been doing the Hell Ride for decades, but it had been infiltrated by a hooligan minority in the past five years.

Despite the tragedy, Mr Crowe said he believed that some riders would go on endangering themselves and others for thrills…

Mr Crowe, who missed Saturday’s ride, said he had been told the man who hit Mr Gould was not a regular rider or a member of a local club.

So what if the lycra bum isn’t a ” regular rider or a member of a local club”? That might mean something in a communist country, but not in common law land. It is not, however, a ‘hooligan minority’ of riders cycling dangerously, deliberately so. It is a very large number of them running red lights and comitting deliberately dangerous antics on roads.

Further, the lycra brigade are vicious types , who, along with mung bean eating commie spiv, the Ministah of Transport Peter Batchelor, are bent on having the roads handed over to the cretins. Roads are built for vehicles. Next, I’m stumped as to why even ‘sensible’ riders bike it on Mlebourne’s roads. That doesn’t make them sensible, they are fools, suicidal fools, as it is.

The lycra bums are obnoxious boors and the very sight of them has induced a nervous affliction: Unlike pedestrians, even the suicidal types, when I see their fat backsides I have to fight down the urge to run the bastard down. This affliction has been developing  for a couple of years, and is increasing in intensity. There are unhappy side effects, I start swearing, unintentionally and so, when there are passengers in the vehicle, I have to go into a swearing avoidance routine. It occurs to me it would be a sound case to sue the conceited, odious cretins because they are the cause of my affliction.

They are conceited cretins; it is obvious from their deliberately dangerous road habits and their attention seeking exhibitionist’s dress.  They rather look silly, hideous and nasty. They might feel ‘cool’ and the centre of the universe wearing their privates and anus exposing spandex, to me they look disgusting; it’s an obscene display which has to be endured everyday. When I wish to see the body beautiful, I can go to a beach and see gorgeous topless women. Whereas, the lycra bums are simply nauseating exhibitionists.

They should do the decent thing and confine themselves to their backyards, where they can ride dangerously, crash into each other, maim and kill each other, and admire their  vomit inducing hideous appearance. They should never been seen nor heard in public, as it is a criminal offence they commit in that.

I’m fortunate, though, I just have a reaction. How many pedestrians have been hit by them ? If not many, then that would be a surprise. In the meantime, two have been killed by a couple of the road rodents.