Archive for the ‘Totalitarian Thuggery’ Category

Questions to be asked or; What is the OPI Show Trial of the ARS really about?

September 29, 2006

There are questions to be asked, to hurt the Bracks Cabinet and ram home what the Show Trial is about. For reasons glaringly obvious, Ted Baillieu and his fellow blobbies, pretending to be Liberal MPs, won’t ask them.

Only one further reason need be added: Ted “The Wimp” Baillieu declared the day he was made leader, “I won’t be attacking Bracks and his ministers, that’s gutter politics.” Ted confuses muckraking personal peccadilloes with bringing the Cabinet to book and, as a consequence, collecting scalps. It’s beneath him, he explained, to hurt Bracks. Then again, neither Dr.Napthine nor Mr.Doyle hurt Bracks, so Ted is standing in a fine tradition of spineless, limp wristed Leadahs.

On the other hand, even if the Leadahs relished hurting Bracks, they couldn’t. First off, you need principles, Liberal principles. Then, you have to be brighter than that lot. Lastly, you need advisers and not half-witted PR types and Krogers’ stick puppets to back you up and supply ammo. Look at Doyle, someone handed him a self propelled chainsaw with which to cut Bracks’ head off. Doyle and the advisers couldn’t find the start button – which is all they had to do, push the start button, and ‘let her rip’. I’m referring, of course, to the scandal of the Scoresby highway project funding, to which, in addition to the cabinet lying to Parliament and the public, also involved financial fraud committed by the Bracks Cabinet.

Doyle was handed the self-propelled chainsaw, incontrovertible documentary evidence of each of the Cabinet’s lies and malfeasance. He laid them out before Parliament. Bracks and co were sweating, they had been caught red-handed for the crooks that they are. They next thing Doyle had to do was to push the start button. He couldn’t find it. His advisers couldn’t find it. Michael Kroger’s stick puppets couldn’t find it. Doyle collapsed huffing and puffing from the exertion of finding the start button. Bracks and all the Cabinet Ministers involved heaved a sigh of great relief; Doyle had let them right off a very long and razor sharp hook.

Things don’t look any better over the disgusting Bracks Cabinet’s novelty, the OPI and the Show trial. Indeed, rather worse because, unlike the Scoresby fraud, this affair is one of those affairs which show up how spineless the blobbies are. They waited until Friday of last week to begin raising mild objections only – Kim Wells last Friday, Doyle on Sunday. Neither one attacked Bracks, the OPI and Nixon. Here’s their objection: ” We have said all along the OPI was the wrong way to go to deal with corruption”. Ooh, that hurt Bracks, really and troooooly. Pathetic. It is one of those matters they wait to find out whether the wind Public Reaction is blowing, and, which way it is blowing.

When Ted, his colleagues, their advisers, the Stick Puppets realised, yes, it blows and the right way, they came out, and huffed and puffed a few innocuous words. Again, typically, after such muscular exertion, nothing has been heard from them again. Bracks, again, has not been hurt. Bracks cannot, surely believe his luck to have such mighty foes. Me, I fancy a 10lb pillow biting dwarf would make a better show of it and up against Joe Frazier; at least the dwarf would go in hard and pound Frazier’s kneecaps.

The OPI Show Trial is not about corruption. The members who have been dragged through this grotesque miscarriage of justice are not corrupt. It is not because they might have dealt a bit of biff out to very dangerous vermin, who are ready to maim and kill even old grannies in the middle of a robbery. It’s something else behind it all, which, in this item we shall leave hanging.

The questions the Opposition needs to follow are in the order of:

  1. Who benefits? Or, to make it plainer these days, follow the money trail.
  2. Which faction in the ALP has driven the establishment of the OPI and show trials and star chambers?
  3. Why has a Q.C lent his professional reputation to what is a mockery of justice, and what is his relationship to the ALP and the Bracks. Cabinet and ALP factions?
  4. Why is Nixon shutting down the ARS?
  5. Why did she fail in her duty to the ARS pout through this disgusting Show Trial?
  6. What is the Bracks Cabinet really aiming at by this back door effort to shut down the ARS, by seeking to smear and have the public convinced the members of the ARS squad are violent criminals?
  7. Who is responsible in the ALP for what is a complete usurpation of justice, law, and due process; and which faction?

These questions assume the Libs and their advisers are possessed of things they are devoid of:

Liberal Principles and spine. More troubling, the OPI Show Trial has crystallised before the public what should have been obvious to all when the Kafkaesque persecution of the Two Pastors was launched. In fact, it should have been obvious right on the day when the Bracks Cabinet even mentioned raising the Blasphemy Bill. What happened instead? The ‘Liberals’ supported it to the hilt and still do.

I keep citing the case of X and Y. This case is still running, what the Bracks Cabinet are directly responsible for, and its agents, falsely called “Public Servants”, “Trustees”, and VCAT “Judges”, is appalling. What they are doing to X and Y makes the extortion and racketeering of the Mafia look mild – why?

The Mafia are only crims, the Bracks Cabinet is in Govt. They are putting X and Y through hell. They are not the only Victorians being subjected by them to such lawless, criminal, savage treatment by the Bracks “Govt.’” And what has been the response of the Libs to it?

I’ve set the case out in detail before: Nothing. David Davies has abrogated his duty to a constituent, whose case is just the sort of case an MP, should fight in Parliament. A case, because of the further implications and principles involved, the whole Liberal Party should fight. This itself shocking, and worse, because many more Vics are being thus tortured.

Someone mused that referring to Kroger and his control of the Liberal Party could be libelous. How so? It never occurred to that individual it’s not because, it is all true. In any case, right now, I don’t give a damn. For: the case of X & Y alone demonstrates disgusting the KKR, their Toorak Political Brahman backers, and their blobby MPs are. These men and women are so unprincipled they do not, as I’ve said many times over, give a stuff about Victorians.

They don’t give a stuff the Bracks: Govt. is not merely overthrowing the Rule of Common Law, but are acting against decent, ordinary Victorians in most disgusting, shocking ways, worthy of, in fact, a totalitarian regime. The Blobby pseudo-Liberal Party have buried the case, of X and Y, and god knows how many others.

Not for them the hard muck of standing up from freedom and defence of Victorians against shocking, actions by the Bracks Government, the actions of tyrannical thugs. Oh, no and the reason is, as the “Liberals” support for the Blasphemy Law and Witch Sniffing Court shows, they are all for tyranny themselves. It is just as well that lot are too dense to appreciate, Liberal Party members detest them: for if they could, then they’d have to come to grips with why they are detested.

Hence, the questions listed above. The questions Ted and co won’t pursue because they are spineless, not Liberal, superannuated blobs pretending to be Liberal MPs.

The Show Trial has backfired, and in several ways

September 22, 2006

The Show trial of the ARS members has brought to a head several things. Already long disgusted with the Bracks appointees Police Commissar Christine Nixon and her paper models of policing, Deputy Commissar Simon Overland and other senior paper shuffling officers sitting on top of them, the police are now mutinous. The Show Trial has drawn attention to the Bracks Junta’s erosion of Common Law, corruption of the courts by stuffing them with trustees, careerists and goons, undermining principles of justice, the substitution of regular courts for witchsniffing Star Chambers.All this, the overthrow of the Rule of Common Law, corruption of the judiciary, overthrow of justice, by the Junta, should have been clear in public when the Junta rammed through its disgusting Blasphemy Bill.

The Churches don’t escape attention either, since it was senior Clergy, of each denomination, which believed Govt., has a right to legislate freedom and common law for a totalitarian measure. Disgusting is the support of the KKR Party for the Blasphemy ‘Act’ and its Star Chamber and KGB type thugs such as Sisely and Szoke. Having alluded to other cases besides Blasphemy Show Trials, one only points out, the shocking persecution of the Two Pastors by the Junta and cretins pretending to be Judges, including the Supreme Court Judge who convicted the Two Pastors, is only the tip of the ice-berg.

Secret trials against Victorians are rather more commonplace than many might imagine. Indeed, the Herald Sun was sued for an article on just one case tried in secret, in which, through its thugs on VCAT and orificers of a govt. department, to use the H.S’s. editor’s words, were ‘deliberately seeking to destroy a family. A very shocking case it is.

Also shocking is the Junta’s actions against X.  The Junta’s Kafkaesque notion of the Rule of Law and Justice is worthy of the Soviet Union. Indeed, Kafka’s The Trial was banned in the USSR because trials in the Soviet Union were as Kafka’s fiction. Soviet style trials are conducted in Brackistaniland with far greater frequency than many readers might imagine. Yet, the already shocking record of the Junta will pale before what will happen in the New Year when Bracks Bill of Communist Anti-Rights comes into force. It cannot be repeated too many times, Bracks’ Anti – Bill of Rights is nothing but a legalese excuse to enslave Victorians – that is the reality of the terms of the Anti-Bill of Rights. There will be exemptions, some types, to repeat again, will be free to commit violent crimes. That is set out in unambiguous terms in the Bill of Right. What is proposed here is worse than selective policing, which can be eliminated. It says, certain types of dangerous criminals are untouchable, and are free to commit violent crimes.

So, on the one hand, under the Junta, while law-abiding Victorians face Kafkaesque show trials for no reason at all, some lucky types will, on the other hand, be free to commit murder, stabbing, rapes, bashings. What the Junta is arranging, the overthrow of Common Law and Justice, and substitution of Secret Police State thugs for Judges, is worse than disgusting: it is treason, it is criminal it is treachery, it is usurpation of Co9mmon Law, and Liberty. It is a Triple headed totalitarian Junta of:

Unfettered Executive,

Bureaucrats, who have been promoted precisely because they do share the same contempt for Common Law as the Junta does

Trustees, careerists and thugs who are called ‘judges’.

A further development is the transformation of VCAT under the Anti-Bill of Rights, which I shall set out in a separate item.

It has taken this Show Trial of the ARS members for the penny to drop. Some are very slow n the uptake.

Sen.-Sgt. Mullett of the Vic. Police Association is wrong in not sheeting home OPI and this Show Trial to the Junta. The Bracks ‘’Cabinet” is directly responsible for them, after all it is the junta which set up the OPI and the Star Chambers. Yet, the totalitarian notion of Law and Justice, so evident in this case, is in reality the basis for what the Junta has been aiming at generally.

To illuminate further, let us reprise the essentials of the case of X:

X is elderly. X is retired. X has multiple sclerosis, the only thing wrong with her. X remarried – to Y. X’s daughters, in an attempt to X’s assets, launched an action against X in VCAT to have her declared insane. They have partly succeeded. A VCAT “Judge’ order the “State Trustees Office to seize X’s band and super fund accounts.

During all that, the daughters have defamed Y, who now has to mount a defamation case against the daughters. The daughters, with their girl friends, keeping in view the ‘girls are in their late 20’s and older, assaulted X and Y one evening. The girls one evening, bashed X to the ground, and in doing so compounded an old hip hairline fracture. They frogmarched X to her residence. They seized Y and flung Y down the stairs of the apartment block. If there had not been an object in the stairwell that broke his fall, he could have been maimed gravely injured or killed. Police laid no charges against the ‘girls’!

A goon of the Junta inside the Office of State Trustees, executed the VCAT order, and, seized the accounts, closed them down and now the funds are somewhere in some general account. Furthermore, to add injury to injury, the Junta is charging X an ‘administration fee’ of 6% to 10% per annum.

That’s right, the Bracks’ Junta stole X’s private property, closed down the accounts and, charging her a ‘fee’ on top.

In the meantime, in VCAT’s ‘Courts’, X is required to ‘prove’ that they are not insane.

I outlined the case to a Professor in Law. He was shocked and disgusted. He was also disgusted when I related the failure of David Davis in, first, his duty as an MP to take this case to Parliament. He remarked:

Oh, once the Junta is involved, that’s it, a victim of the Junta has a slim chance of successfully fightuing the case. The slim chance is, going to the expense of hiring a top Silk. He observed, it is all but impossible to fight without engaging a leading QC Keep in view readers, the original reason for setting up VCAT was to provide low cost common law courts, not Stalinist Inquisitorial Show Trials by which to ruin victims of the Junta. (And some readers object to my rather strong language against the Junta. Yes, well, when you see what the Bracks Junta is on about in all its brutal horrors, readers might conclude I’m rather too polite in my selection of adjectives and names for that pack of criminal scumbags. Steve Bracks , a  Christian? – bullshit he is, he is a mobster,  a crim, a liar and a competely rotten fat little useless professional dolebludging totalitarian thug, ditto the rest of the Junta).

The Sow Trial and its conduct is not, therefore, a-typical of the Junta. A complete overthrow of the Rule of Common Law and Principles of Justice is on show. Let’s cover the essential features.

1. The “OPI” had gathered ‘evidence’ against the, in effect, accused.

2.The OPI didn’t raise criminal charges against the members of the ARS – which is most interesting. It ran a secret Star Chamber trial, euphemistically’ called an inquiry.

3. It then set up this public show trial “inquiry” against them. It is not an ‘inquiry, it is a show trial.

a. – The accuseds are not allowed to cross-examine ‘witnesses’

b.- Hearsay is admitted as evidence.

c. – The accused are assumed to be guilty of crimes, though they have not been charged of crimes, nor tried for crimes, nor convicted of crimes.

d. It is demanded the accused say things which will incriminate themselves, even if falsely. The accused have been told they will be convicted of perjury and given long term jail sentences unless they change their statements.

c. The accused are expected to make self-incriminating statements, which will then be used against them on a criminal trial which will use the ‘Inquiry’ as a core body of evidence basis of the trial

d. Before the Show Trial, counsel for the accused had not been informed of any evidence against their clients, in order to make discovery of exactly what evidence, as well as, it has turned out, criminal allegations against their clients.

e. OPI claims it has gathered evidence against them, indeed presented video tape of a prisoner being given a clip over the ear and being told to cooperate or ‘do it the hard way’. If crimes had been committed, and in possession of evidence, then criminal charges should have been made and sent to a regular court for trial.

Curiously, who the individual is not identified on the tape.

Let’s look at some of these points in closer detail:

i. Mr Berkeley, QC is presiding. He has already told the accused if they do not say what he wants to hear he will have them charged with perjury and write adverse reports against the accused.

Just on the strength of those statements, Berkeley is not impartial and asserting due process. He is biased; he has already convicted the accused. He is merely following the convictions with the formalities of acting as prosecutor and jury. He has deliberately stopped Counsel for the accused to do what they have to do, not represent their clients in an inquiry only, but defend them in a ShowTrial.

Berkeley has threatened counsel for the accused with finding them in contempt of court! Well, it is clear who has contempt for what: It is Berkeley QC who has contempt for the law, justice and Common Law Courts.

ii During the OPI investigation, one of the ARS was promoted. Deputy Commissioner Overland, Nixon’s stick attachment, explained it on radio yesterday thus:

-Promotions are separate and internal to Vic Police. [Wow, not really, golly gosh].

-The evidence, the video had already been obtained, but they promoted the ARS member because, he explained thus (and I carefully recorded it):

“At that stage it was not appropriate nor possible to disclose that information in the course of a promotional situation, and so that process had to run its course.”

Here we have an OPI ‘investigation’, in which its orificers are working to have the accused convicted of crimes, and already in possession of what, as it has turned, its main piece of material evidence. It has ‘witnesses’, the crims in prison that they asked; ‘Do you have any complaints against ARS?’ Senior bureaucrats pretending to be police are fully apprised of these ‘discoveries’ and yet, they promote one of the ARS.

Overland’s excuse is rubbish. Since the evidence, such as it is, had already been collected; the duty was to charge them men formally then. Instead, they promoted one member the squad.

Neither Overland nor Nixon discern why they are no merely wrong, but are in grave breech of their duty as servants of common law courts.

Now, this is very interesting:

“Barrister Sean Cash said the public hearings were a needless repetition of what had already been canvassed in earlier private hearings, suggesting the motive was political.”Nothing new found. So, why weren’t writs issued, if the case had merits as soon as the first inquiry had been completed? Well, it is clear why not: The Junta has decided to circumvent the law and launch a show trial. By using a Soviet type Show Trial, it has clearly decided to convict the accused rightly or wrongly by a disgusting, shocking, and insidious and corrupt measure.In the same article for the last quote:“It’s an unparalleled public humiliation that we as a community should be ashamed and embarrassed of,” he said.Mr Berkeley said it was police bashing suspects that the community should be ashamed. Mr Cash responded: “Then charge him.”After being threatened with expulsion if he didn’t sit down, Mr Cash said: “You’ll gag me, will you?”

Told to “sit down now” Ms Cash said, “I will do that” and slammed down a folder saying: “I’m ashamed to be a lawyer . . . It’s political.”

It is Cash who is right, not Bracks KGB thug, Berkeley.

Now, we have why the police what the heads of Nixon and Overland, other Bracks Junta appointees to roll: they complied with a gross mockery of law and justice against a squad of men, who are not accused of corruption, but dealing a bit of biff out to very dangerous crims. They betrayed men who, unlike those politically correct, ductile, craven careerists, who actually do work in the sort of jobs the police are meant to serve.

They didn’t have the guts to require the men be charged as soon as OPI concluded its ‘investigation’. No, they happily co-operated in putting those men throw a secret Star Chamber interrogation and, now a Show Trial. And, the reason they didn’t have the guts to do it is the reason why the Junta appointed them to the top jobs in the police force, to be faithful good dog rover type servants to the Junta, and not the Rule of Common Law and the Courts regular.

The case has general implications:

It is entirely consistent, as stated above, with the aims of the Junta, to usurp the bastion against tyranny, Common Law, Common Law Courts, the principles of justice of Common Law, the corruption of the judiciary by appointing as ‘judges’ those who are:

Hostile to common law and will serve the Junta’s aims

Those ignorant in Common Law, no grounding in it even if only through practice, as in the case of the latest Bracks’ and Hulls’, appointment to the Supreme Court.

Sacking judges, who are stiff in common-law judges, as was done to a former Chief Magistrate.

Setting up Star Chambers and Witchsniffing Courts run by KBG type thugs pretending to be Judges.

This is what this case is about, because, that is exactly what is on show in it, the high treason of the Junta; it’s usurpation of the Rule of Law. It will get worse in the New Year, when Bracks’ Anti- Bill of Rights comes into force. As it is, it is bad enough:

The disgusting persecution of two decent men, the Two Pastors at the hands of the Junta.

The nightmarish savage treatment of X, with the Bracks stealing X’s private property, and transferring the funds into its own accounts, charging X an ‘admin’ and demanding that X ‘prove themself not insane’ – the consequence will be, and the case thus weighted tremendously against X, is, on the conclusion the Junta seeks, X will lose all their property and be turfed out into the streets.

Yet, there are, on what has been related by others, no a few, but a very disturbing number of Victorians who are Victims of the Junta, who have been put through a qausi-judicial nightmare and as the Junta stripped them off their property rights. Many of these cases are run in secret and it is understandable why: because the Junta wouldn’t survive the public outcry and anger.

I’m not exaggerating; the Bracks Junta are nothing but communist totalitarian thugs. They are lawless, they are criminals, they are liars, they have  only one aim, to reduce Victorians to slavery. Oh, yes, Bracks, you are a moron and a fat lying little commie totalitarian bag of shite.

The Bracks Junta will be the first overtly totalitarian regime on Australian Soil; It nearly is at is .

September 14, 2006

Neil Mitchell launched a scoop on 3 AW this morning. He had received a tape of a meeting between Police Commissar Nixon on the now defunct Armed Robbery Squad. The purpose of it, Nixon telling the members of the squad it has been struck off, the members to be seconded to any other element of Vic. Police. She commenced in her usual managerialese-socio-babble-in whiny voice mod e-gobble-de-gook until an officer told to stop babbling and get on with it.So, what did she tell them but this: having, in her babble, repeated in an interview, ” we are changing the model to make it safer for police and try new approaches.’ When told to stop babbling, she came out with the real reason, she or, rather, her Mastahs, the Bracks Junta, simply wished top close it down.

The excuse is the complaints against members of the squad had been lodged claiming they are thugs. Where did the complaints come from? That bit of rubbish called the O.P.I. the “office of Police Integrity.

OPI orificers visited a jail and  asked convicts whether they had complaints against the Armed Robbery Squad. Well, surprise, surprise, they did have complaints. The O.P.I. acted on those complaints, and the junta had its excuse to shut down what happened to be a very effective serious crime-fighting unit. The “O.P.I.”, a suitable politically correct, socialisto babble speak Orifice of the Junta, was set up in the wake of the furore over the old drug squad. The Armed Robbery squad, however , is squeaky clean.It’s members are tough, and accept what they are paid to do, engage in a dangerous job bringing dangerous criminals to book, They have done it, fearlessly. Their crime is, well, not being nice to hardened, violent criminals.

The Squad has been very effective in bringing armed robbers to book. In contrast, violent crime has been  in generalincreasing, and the numbers of dangerous criminals have been multiplying exponentially. The reason is simple; the Bracks Junta has been making the streets safe for dangerous crims.

his, perhaps, is the real reason for the disbanding of the Squad. You, see, the members did take bringing violent crims to book seriously and do so in a tough war, unlike the treatment of so many other dangerous, violent criminals who are, effectively, depicted by the Junta and compliant Judges, as more victims than the real victims of violent scumbags.Nixon, being a Bracks Junta appointee, has been ‘modeling’ a model of dealing with armed robbery and, police will now apply the new lego model.

The law abiding man in the streets of Victoria has had enough with the garbage of rehabilitation’ and don’t tread on the toes of savages approach of the increasingly totalitarian morons, who who stuff Spring St., bureaucracy or, rather, goon squads, and ‘judiciary’.

Well, it is no surprise crims rule in Vic., ok, when the lying, professional dole bludgers in Spring Street are busily overthrowing private property rights, imposing police sate ‘laws’ – inclusive of the property rights in oneself. So, basically, the notion that the one thing that might justify ‘govt.’, use of coercion,in service of common law courts, against violent crims, is shredded by the fact the Junta, at bottom, is nothing but a pack of violent criminals in their actions; they are no better than the scumbags terrorizing Victorians because they are lawless. The Blasphemy Bill makes that clear.

Where are we heading? Britain is a pretty good clue. British police are no longer in the business of bringing scumbags to book. No, they are too busy ‘enforcing’ E.U. ‘Charter of Hooman Rights’, E.U. ‘Law’ and the L.P. Govt’s. own police state law’ against  decent types, whose offences range from selling fruit and veges in imperial weights to defending their own life and limb.

Indeed, defending one’s own life and limb is now a crime; they call it ‘taking the law into your hands’. Hell, the Oz federal Govt. has made sure no Aussie can defend life, limb and property because of it’s ‘gun laws’. No, the crim is free to shoot you. Rape you, bash you, stab you but that’s ok because, as is made plain by the Bracks Junta, absolutists pretending to be judges, and the totalitarian bent bureaucrats, hiding behind psycho-babble, take great pains to ‘educate’ Victorians into, the crims have ‘hooman rights’, and crims are mostly victims of ‘social injustice ‘ and ‘great personal hurt.’ Well,, unless you are white Anglo-Celt-Saxon aspirational type.

Now, on the count of crime, things will deteriorate further in Victoria and for no less a reason than the Junta’s “Charter of Human Rights”. That Bill, once it is enacted, virtually confers on selected ‘unique cultural types’ ‘rights’ to commit violent crimes”. If any of those protected types kill, rape, bash, stab a whitey, it is just because anyone who is of Celtic-Anglo-Saxon descent thoroughly deserves it. Yes, that is the force of the B.O.R. Aborginies are singled out in  to enjoy this novel privilege unhampered altogether, in a country which is meant to be ruled by the otherwise impersonal and high civilisation tradition of the Rule of Common Law.

Then, that is what the politicians, too many on the bench and rather many bureaucrats have been aiming at, the complete overthrow of the Rule of Common Law. What the B.o.R. effects, once enacted, is automatic subjection of all Victorians into vassal slaves of the Junta. All rights are no longer grounded in property rights.

Any right is reduced to a boon granted by the Junta. Your property – yourself, your home, goods, chattels, and economic assets, are no longer yours, the Junta owns everything. The Bill establishes that.

Moreover, the buttress against tyranny is totally overthrown. No Judge, including Supreme Court Judges can decide case contrary tot he letter of the B.O.R. or, even more rubbery, it’s ‘intent’. Under the B.O.R. no one is permitted to appeal to the High Court of Australia. In any case, Bracks and Hulls have made sure, the Supreme Court cannot rise against totalitarian measures.

The last appointee has never practiced as a barrister. Her greatest familiarisation with common law is ‘femininst studies.’ The other other one is not much better as she reassured Victorians, ” I will bring a female persective to law’.

The notion of rights contained in the bill belongs to the totalitarian notions of ‘govt’ as advanced by such as Hobbes and Comtes, and is not rooted in the real source of rights, absolute property rights and they are essential to economic freedom. The liberty of the individual is thus grounded and, what is more, Common Law is generated out of that, property rights and economic freedom; they are the grounds of Liberty and Common Law, which is why C.L.is, or was, the buttress against tyranny. One of the many leftist ignoramuses on the Spencer Street Soviet, aka the Age, wrote on Law :

the job of Parliament is to ‘rectify the law’.

Garbage, sheer garbage, the function of law is to protect free men and women against tyrannous politicians and bureaucrats and, as required reign in tyrants by bringing them to book.Not that that is transparent given the sheer numbers of ‘lawyers’ and judges’ in Victoria who are committed to some variation on the theme, ‘my ideal form of absolutism’, and the ‘Civil Liberties’ brigade are no damned better.

Oh, ‘Civil libertarians’ whine, loudly, for pet leftist causes, but never against the real threat to liberty. Then, the Law schools have long been busily stamping out Common Law as an irritant and a disturbance to the vision of a wunnerful day when totalitarian scumbags will prevail unhindered, and that day is upon us in Victoria. We already have a taste of it, the most obvious instance being the Blasphemy Law.

A few citations and quotes are in order:

In his second reading speech, head KGB goon, Attorney General Hulls boasts it is nothing like the U.S. Bill of Rights. Well, he is correct but not for the right reasons. The aim of the U.S. Bill, was to uphold the freedom of individuals against ‘govt.’ and tyranny’. Activist judges, much encouraged by treacherous ‘Democratic’ administrations have eroded the aim but it was the aim.

He also remarked, courts will not have ‘the power to strike down legislation’. It is highly understandable why that is a central term of the Junta’s Bill Of Rights.

He claims the Bill will be ‘educative’, the favorite cliché of an excuse of leftists for overthrowing real freedoms and property rights. The function, in common law, is not ‘educative’; it is the preservation of Liberty.

For those who wish to read the rest of Hulls’  rot,  turn to this page.

Bracks and Hulls are Liars, and here is an example, stated by a Liberal M.P., McIintosh, in the Lower House:

As I was made aware today, many judges see themselves as big winners in this circumstance. Out of professional courtesy I will not name the judge, because I knew him well at the bar, but a particular judge in anticipation of this charter of rights is already advocating that people should be preparing their submissions to courts where they are appearing before him with a view to raising issues of human rights.

Indeed with a case as simple as the Ansett insolvency case, which I thought was simple although it involved convoluted and complex technical aspects of insolvency and corporate law, now according to this particular judge involves issues of human rights. The sweep of human rights according to this judge will be all encompassing.

Ladies and gentleman, that is a Judge who is cheerily preparing for the day when common law is finished. Notice what the statement contains, the implicit fact property rights, the ground of liberty, is thrown down for ‘hooman rights’. Those who might remark, yes but the example the M.P. gives applies to companies and so it won’t hurt the ‘little man’ need to get a grip on law, for those who believe so are wrong. In fact, they are already wrong, for many ‘laws’ politicians and bureaucrats claim to be aimed at only stopping this or that ‘crime’ in fact hit the most modest of actions and interests. The B.o.R is worse, because it is exhaustive and absolute in what is dictated to the new vassal slaves called Victorians.

Above, I remarked, certain favored types will be free to virtually commit serious crimes Scot-free. Juveniles certainly do so today in Victoria. I find these remarks interesting because they cover all criminals:

I note that we have a matter of public importance on this issue — specifically in relation to sentencing — brought on by TheNationals for tomorrow. Under this charter decisions that are made in Canada are relevant…

There is a famous case in Canada — Askov’s case. The result of that case was that delays in excess of six to eight months between committal and trial were found to be unacceptable. As a result, people charged with conspiracy to commit extortion were given a permanent stay of proceedings because of a delay in excess of six

to eight months — in that case it was some 23 months.

As a direct consequence of that ruling, in the space of little over two years in Ontario alone some 43,000 charges were either dismissed, stayed or held over, never to reappear in the courts. The chronic delays in the Canadian courts were of such significance that they allowed a permanent stay of serious extortion charges. The charges dropped as a result were not just

driving charges but also manslaughter charges, several serious assault charges, several serious sexual assault charges, and charges of assault of police with a weapon…dismissed as a direct consequence of this ruling.

You will not get a trial date within 12 months if you are pleading not guilty to a serious charge in the State of Victoria….a recent statement by the secretary of the Criminal Bar Association of Victoria verifies that position. I have taken the opportunity to talk to a number of lawyers, who all agree…( and) problem is that it seems to be getting worse. Even

the government’s own papers demonstrate that delays in our courts are getting profoundly longer. Last financial year 88 per…

No further comment is required. On property rights:

…that flows from that is what happens to our property rights. Whatever else the international covenant has in it, we have gone down this channel historically before…

We debated a bill here that deprived people effectively of their property rights in the St Kilda triangle. The government said, ‘No, we didn’t’. It is still there, notwithstanding its being completely surrounded and notwithstanding that there was a case before the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal where the vindication of that particular leasehold was sought by the government.

In fact, as I have detailed in the case of X, the Junta through its goons squads, VCAT and, State Trustees (turned into a goon squad) has stolen private property, stripped financial assets of X, closed X’s accounts down and, are forcing her to prove herself not insane. This is before the Bill of Rights is enacted.

McIntosh gives more examples. What the B.OR does, in case anyone has not read it yet, makes it ‘legal’ for the Junta to take any of your property without even bothering to make any of its regular lies as excuses, and defend its confiscations in court an Parliament.

That is correct, the Junta can knock on your doorstep and take your property. In fact, it has put up Acts and articles of Acts, which already serve as pretexts for stealing your property and to resist invasion of your property by one of its goons is a criminal offence entailing prison sentences. One sch article is aimed at parents who would prefer yo school their children at home than in Victorian brainwashing camp euphemistically called a school. The next quote is amusing:

under clause 8 of the draft that was issued by the government, there was reference to the right to life. It

resided in subclause (1) of that draft, which reads: Every person has the right to life and has the right not to be arbitrarily deprived of life.

Subclause (2) reads: For the purposes of this Charter, subsection (1) applies to a person from the time of his or her birth. But the government found that it got into deep water about what is to be constituted by the definition of life. It found that it hit all sorts of hurdles amongst people in the community, so it took out that subclause. It took out any suggestion in this legislation about the notion of this impacting upon the right to life.The government even put a savings provision into this legislation, which appears in clause 48:Nothing in this Charter affects any law applicable to abortion or child destruction, whether before or after thecommencement of Part 2.

The right of anyone born in Victoria isn’t a right bestowed upon them by a pack of lying, snivelling socialistos. It is grounded in him-/herself, and upheld in common law but, as I commenced,  common law is overthrown by the Junta, courts and ‘department of corrections’ daily, and completely in the BOR. In Britain, as pointed out above, one’s rights are eliminated, since it is now even a criminal offence to defend oneself. And notice that Hitlerian/ Stalinist/Islamo-Nazi turn of phrase, ‘Child-destruction’.

That phrase is chilling. One can very well imagine a barrister entering the defence, a murder is not in fact a murder because he/she merely “destroyed a child.”.Clause 12, of Pt.2 of the Bill is a real gas:

Every person lawfully within Victoria has the right to move freely within Victoria and to enter and leave it and has the freedom to choose where to live.

That is your freedom under Common Law. Now, it is conditional upon the whim of the Junta. Just examine the three conditioning phrases of Clause 12. The grammatical force is unambiguous, the freedom of movement and residence anywhere in Victoria is actually struck down because it is allowed only at the whim of the Junta. No-one, expect for the members of the Junta, are in fact free to do so, since the property rights underpinning freedom of dwelling, movement, entry and exit are non-existent once the Bill is enacted and in force, those three conditioning terms makes that plain.

The above is the beginning of what will be an exhaustive scrutiny of the Bill and what the rotten commie scumbags responsible for it are actually about. I will take pains in covering it because the whole rotten totalitarian measure warrants a fulsome evisceration.The ALP is not submitting its BORs to referendum.

It has already altered the Constitution, several times. Unlike the Federal Constitution, it can do it by simple administrative bills Parliament. The Junta won’t submit BOR  to referendum, for a not so simple reason. why not is simple. Voters will  take the whole bloody lot of them and flog them to an inch of their lives because of it and ram there BOR up their unmentionables.

Instead, they are pushing this Bill through parliament and, hey presto, in one instant, and then a stroke of the G.-G’s. pen, and it’s a full-blown totalitarian regime Junta installed. Damn their miserable, useless, fat hides. The good for nothing, professional dole-bludging, totalitarian scumbags should be thrown into prison for treason – yes, literally, because that is what it amounts to. So they should be, and before it is too late.

Gunter Grass Eviscerated

August 29, 2006

Gunter Grass’ confession is disgusting in what he omitted to say, showing Grass to be a contemptible, vile scumbag. Daniel shows why, in deadly form, in  a two part letter to the murderous, treacherous leftist, communist fellow traveller, former SS devotee to Hitler, and traitor still to the West.  

Leftists froth at the mouth in fury, out of  their denial of Nazism, Communism, Fascism are all hues of the one more nasty excuse for totalitarian thuggery and worse, socialism. To deny the fact, however, is to lie about history. It is worth restating what I wrote on the flag mast above:

Socialism is an excuse to pauperise untold millions,enslave untold millions,murder untold millions,reduce untold millions,over a century now,into misery,squalor,and depravity. 

 Grass’ plea, when I heard him utter it, made my scrawl. Johnson has quoted it:

 “”What I am experiencing is an attempt to make me a persona non grata, to cast doubt on everything I did in my life after that.”, to cast doubt on everything I did in my life after that.”

Johnson’s letter makes plain why Grass resorted to such a shallow, whining  exercise in self-eculpation. Johnson is right, in view of the evidence, Grass is not a changed man, let alone repentant. No, Grass is upset because Nazi, Fascist and Communist regimes were defeated, and so could not finish off the millions yet unslaved and not murdered by them. On the other hand, that is why leftists support and work for the enemy, inclusive of U.N., and Amnesty International – an ally to defeat civilised  Westerners. Grass is, underneath it all, cheering on the enemies of the civilised, and cheering on the Islamo Nazis bent on the extermination of the Jews.

Gunter Grass at bottom, is a monster, for it is with savages his loyalties and beliefs belong all along. 

A few quotes, gives nothing away, doesn’t give away the full charge Daniel Johnson delivers in excellent style. He breifly mentions the distinguished Professor in History, Joachim Fest, who has also declared in trenchant terms against Grass.

You tell us that you did not ask to join the Waffen SS, but rather the U-boats — whose recruits were also notoriously hard-line Nazis, by the way. The historian Joachim Fest does not believe this story, and neither do I. (He says he would not buy a used car from you now, and who can blame him?)

By the time you volunteered in 1943, it was clear to all but those blinded by ideology that Germany was losing the war. By joining up in the Waffen SS, you were joining the Nazi elite, a band of bloody brothers who believed they were destined to rule Europe. They did not take just anyone.

You make light of it, but it is further proof that you, along with many German teenagers, were steeped in the Nazi death cult. You and your comrades were careless of how many people you killed, for to you they were scarcely human. Your mentality was not unlike that of the Islamist suicide bombers of today.

The last photograph of Hitler shows him decorating lads like you. All the evidence points to you having been not only a fanatical Nazi but a dangerous one too, eager to wear the death’s head insignia of the SS.

Like your American counterpart Noam Chomsky, like countless writers and intellectuals of the left from Gabriel Garcia Marquez to Harold Pinter, you have worked hard to discredit the political and economic system to which you owed your success: capitalism. You did your best over many years to undermine the Atlantic alliance — the same alliance, incidentally, that liberated Europe from the tyranny of your countrymen.

During the Cold War, and now in the war against Islamist terror, you have frequently made use of your hard-won liberty to make common cause with its enemies. You joined in the mythologizing of the Baader-Meinhof terrorist movement. You are a supporter of the European ideal, but only as a counterweight to America. You were delighted when Chancellor Schröder broke with President Bush over the Iraq issue, and legitimized the tide of anti-Americanism that then swept Germany.

You embarked on a quixotic campaign to persuade Germans that they would really be better off living in two states.The only people who agreed with you were the old communist intellectuals who had done well out of the division of Germany.Yet even they, apologists for a totalitarian regime in which they no longer believed, were not as disingenuous as you.

You are often compared to Thomas Mann, but you are no more a Mann than you are a man. The only Mann character with whom you have much in common is Felix Krull, the confidence trickster. Your rise and fall recalls the greatest of all German myths, that of Faust, which Mann explicitly connected with Nazism.…my German teacher had eyes only for you: the hero of the West German Left, the very model of a modern intellectual.For you, it seems, the war wasn’t over. You still wanted a Europe, and especially a Germany, that was Judenrein, ethnically cleansed of Jews. Given your hostility to Israel today, some 60 years later, we are entitled to ask whether your “denazification” went far enough.

While Grass’ feelings are hurt, he feels so hurt he will have to run off to a charlatan called a psychologist to feel  happy again, because he feels “”What I am experiencing is an attempt to make me a persona non grata, to cast doubt on everything I did in my life after that.” Unlike ensuring others are made persona non grata by mass murdering them and enslaving them to hideous totalitarian regimes Nazi, Communist and Islamic.

If the allied soliders could have realised what they had captured alive, they would have shot him on the spot. Then, that is why, as Johnson explains, he lied about his past and his beliefs until this year. The fascinating thing is, why did Grass confess to his Nazi Past now?

The answer is: the Stasi file on Gunter Grass will be is due to be released next year. So, as Johnson relates, with the help of his leftist Islamo hugging mates in the media, he decided to get in first and blunt the public reaction to the material which will be freely avialibale tom the public. His Stasi file will make most interesting reading since, it will disclose, unquestionably the full extent of not simply his Nazi past but his service to the USSR and the Soviet Puppet regime of East Germany.

There is no place left on earth to hide Grass.You might as well top yourself, for that is the only decent thing you will have done for the West.

Open Letter to Günter Grass:

         Part I             ,    Part II

Expansion on a point per Illustration

August 29, 2006

“Regulation is a number of things: It is a tax. It compels firms to cash in capital to comply. It cripples the capacity of entrepreneurs to run firms to markets.” From, the item below “ Central Planning : Soviet Style GozPlan Telephone Set – string attached to tin can“.

A case illustration. I refer, again, to the case of a light processing firm. To recapitulate, it is the firm which washes and packages into cellophane bags salads for sale in supermarket chains. It is in N.S.W.

Each year the firm has to expend $500,000 on meeting alone O.H.&S. complaince renewal, without which the goon squad of the N.S.W. govt. will shut it down. The $500,000 per annum expenditure on compliance renewal does not, of course, per product unit cost of applying OH&S in actual production.

For the firm to increase scale, in order to increase volume of output, the firm would by force of Govt. diktat in O.H. & S., have to incur higher annual renewal costs and then higher production costs. This would entail the firm would shift from profitable to loss making.

The upshot is, the owners, while they would like to increase scale, they won’t increase capital. Another upshot is, as the owners declared increasing capital, would increase the number of full time employees required. Needless to say, those potential jobs won’t be opened.

 Further, there are no economic profits to induce scaling up. No free enterprise can extort or force consumers to pay higher prices. Next, the frim cannot reduce prices further to increase demand because of the imposed cost burdens, of which O. H. and S. is but one.

The case, because of its simplicity, makes plain the point, regulation constricts production, it sacks capital, it cripples markets, it ensures shortages. It cripples the capacity of entrepenuers to work capital, and to accumulate capital. Indeed, as this case makes plain, it pays entrpeneurs  halt expansion up to a level internal for that firm which would see the burden of regulation compounded for that firm.

Peter Costello, and fellow KKR Puppet Master to Michael Kroger, believes ‘regualtion’ is the Rule of Law. Not it is not, it is the rule of dictators and their goon squads. regulation serves nothing at all but the desire of politicians and bureaucrats to enslave many to the yoke of National socialist tyranny, or, in realty, to themselves the real beneficiaries of ‘regulation’. Regulation serves neither firms, investors, employees, consumers. Adds not one jot to successful production. To the contrary, it imposes losses on those victims of venal, craven, power hungry, empire building socialist spivs called politicians and bureaucrats. That is all. 

Regulation wreaks economic carnage, and it is a lever for the overthrow of the Rule of Common Law in favour of the rule of thugs.